QUESTION OF THE MONTH

More and more local associations are incorporating the latest technology into their training programs. Which response is MOST indicative of your experience?
(Please choose only one)

My association uses A LOT of technology in our training program, regularly employing video, PowerPoints and/or online resources.

My association uses SOME technology in our training program, periodically employing video, PowerPoints and/or online resources.

My association RARELY uses technology in our training program, infrequently employing video, PowerPoints and/or online resources.

My association NEVER uses technology in our training program; we have never used any video, PowerPoints and/or online resources.

Click here to fill
out survey

JULY POLL RESULTS

Which of the following is the most important attribute for an official to have?

NASO members said:
38%

Quality decision-making skills.

34%

Good people-management skills.

18%

Solid rules knowledge.

7%
Solid mechanics knowledge.
3%

High level of fitness

DID YOU KNOW?

As a member of NASO, Unintentional Errors and Omissions Insurance Coverage is provided for claims alleging a breach of duty as an official by reason of error and omission occurring while acting as an official. Errors and Omissions coverage extends to $50,000 per occurrence and is included in NASO’s aggregate limits. 

Bottom line — if someone sues you because of a game call you made, you have coverage. You’re also covered if someone sues you for a decision you made as an assigner or clinician.

Please visit www.naso.org to view all NASO benefits or call 262/632-5448 for further details.

ARCHIVED ISSUES

To view previous issues of NASO LockerRoom
Click here

Volume 10, Number 8
August 10, 2009

Pick Up Your Game With a New Sport

Many of us who have pulled on the stripes have, at one time or another, considered broadening our horizons and adding a sport. It is, indeed, the rare official at the high school level who officiates one sport these days.

With the shortage of officials in many sports, a veteran adding another sport seems ideal. Certainly the “learning curve” will be shorter for officials who take their stripes from the field to the court, and it solves some problems for schedulers. What about the official? Are there hidden benefits to be gained by taking on another sport? Probably more than you imagined.

Back to the beginning. Adding a new sport and becoming, for all intents and purposes, a rookie again can help you take your game back to the basics. We reach a comfort level after a number of years officiating the same sports at the same schools. We may fall into routines that are not helpful. For example, if you are working a baseball game with an experienced partner at a school close by, you may anticipate no “surprises,” and have a truncated pregame with your partner — if one at all. Becoming a rookie again will, in essence, force you to have a meaningful pregame. Revisiting that ritual may help you to recall the value in holding such meetings with every partner prior to every game. The results can’t help but help.

By the book. When you’re new at a sport, mechanics seem more important. You tend to avoid shortcuts and laziness. Going through another rookie experience may help you sharpen your mechanics in all sports by pointing out areas where you may have started relaxing. Better mechanics give a better impression. Renewed concentration on mechanics can only help revitalize your game.

Apples and oranges. Related to mechanics is positioning. Different sports require different angles and varying visual acuity. I know football officials who felt their game improved after adding basketball because they became adept at “looking through” players to see action. Watching an 83-mile-per-hour fastball come in may help you get an eye for the volleyball spike.

Give up the crutch. You’ve probably worked with experienced veterans who practically make the calls before the action is over. The crutch of “experienced anticipation” is not available to the new official. You must wait for the play to end before you can make a call. You slow down to pause, read and react. That is a valuable lesson for every official to recall.

I love this game. Perhaps the most critical lesson to learn from adding a new sport is the recollection of why we decided to do this in the first place: We love it! A renewed interest in the sports we’ve been calling for years will add new life to our efforts and increase the “psychic” pay we take home.

The real question is not should you officiate a new sport, but why shouldn’t you?

Written by Dave Sabaini, a freelance writer and official who lives in Terre Haute, Ind.This article originally appeared in the 5/05 issue of Referee.


NFHS Basketball Rules Brought to Life

You’ve worked hard, honed your skills and dedicated yourself to the process of continually learning and bettering yourself and your opportunities. It’s with that same spirit that the NFHS has developed Rules by Topic and Simplified & Illustrated for basketball. The remarkable publications make it easy to familiarize yourself with everything new for the year and reacquaint yourself with each and every rule.

2009-10 High School Basketball Rules by Topic separates the rules into logical categories so you can study all the rules related to a topic at one time, without jumping all over. You’ll also get case plays, rationales and background on each rule to give you a complete understanding. No more jumping from article to article — it’s all in one spot.

2009-10 High School Basketball Rules Simplified & Illustrated expands upon the rules by showing you each rule using Referee’s exclusive PlayPic™ and MechaniGram™ illustrations. Each rule, including some of the more complex, is broken down into simplified definitions and then shown in detailed images.

Studying the rules in more than one way will help you learn them faster and more completely than you ever thought possible. Find coverage of every rule including new and revised rules and official NFHS points of emphasis for the new season including:

Rule Changes:

End-of-game replay in state championship series contests

Red/LED light permitted to end quarter/extra period

Editorial Changes:
Timeout area
Injured player
•. Safety concerns
Free-throw violation
Free-throw positioning

Points of Emphasis:

1. Traveling
2. Closely guarded
3. Three seconds
4. Block/charge
5. Free-throw administration

There is simply no better way to make sure you know the rules inside and out than by studying with the 2009 NFHS Rules by Topic and Simplified & Illustrated. Make sure you have yours.

Available to ship in September.
Click here to order today or call 262/632-8855.
Association discounts are available, call for more information.


Ruling Favors Texas Football Officials

A San Antonio court of appeals in June ruled in favor of high school officials Charles Harpole, Jim Carroll, Alan Kwast, Albert Lopez and Brock Pittman that they were not liable in carrying out their duties on the football field during a game in 2004. The crew has been in and out of court with Midwest Employers Casualty Company, which had been seeking damages for Brackenridge High School Coach Terry English as part of a $10 million lawsuit that was filed in 2006. English suffered a Grade 3 traumatic brain injury during a sideline collision with Harpole at a 2004 game, leaving English with impaired memory and forcing him to retire from teaching and coaching. Harpole sustained a concussion, but was not seriously injured and returned to officiating.

Midwest, in an effort to recoup expenses that it has paid and continues to pay English, was twice denied summary judgment against the officiating crew by a trial court. Midwest then went to a San Antonio appellate court earlier this year, but the court ruled in favor of the officials. Midwest still has the option to appeal to the Texas Supreme Court.

An amicus brief, filed by NASO on behalf of the football officiating crew in Texas, played a role in supporting the officials involved in the case. Below are some comments about the brief from those involved and interested in the case.

“We at NASO feel the matter at stake is of significance to all officials, football and all other sports. We feel it is vital to prevail upon the appeals court on the basis presented in this amicus.” — NASO President Barry Mano

“The amicus provided multiple benefits. On the one hand, it bolstered the legal arguments and provided additional support for the court to make the ruling the way it did. The amicus can argue public policy issues and sort of provide a broader public view to the court than the parties that actually have a dog in the fight. It is beneficial for the court to have the additional analysis that the amicus provided.” — Attorney Gary Schumann, who helped to represent the officials.

“You never really know how (the courts) come to their decision or what motivates them, but it is clear to me that this (the amicus) was a good decision.” — Attorney Alan Goldberger, who drafted the amicus on behalf of NASO.

“I am proud to be a member of NASO, which will stand up for officials at all levels. What happened to Charles Harpole could happen to any of us while we are on the field or court.” — William Miller, sports official from Wichita Falls, Texas.


Let's Hear Your Best Story ...

You’ve probably been sharing your best officiating stories at any number of postgame crew gatherings for years. Referee magazine wants to publish your favorite war story from the officiating trenches. Type up your story in 900 words or less and e-mail it to lastcall@referee.com. Sure, you might lose the opportunity to tell the story to your buddies, but now you’ll have an even bigger audience. Here’s a story about an official who lost his cool as a coach.

I Turned into One of Them

By David Knopf

It was a three-on-three soccer tournament, a “national tour stop” leading to the promised land — the finals in sunny Orlando, Fla.

I’d refereed for years, but was now coaching eight-year-olds, one of whom was my son. Our team was strong and could make the tournament finals. That singular goal, though, prompted a 57-year-old coach to act like a fool.

It was hot, and the parents had brought tents, cold drinks and snacks to keep the kids primed for several games in one day.

Before our game, I spotted a friend’s son on the field next to ours. The 13-year-old referee was crying after being yelled at by an adult coach. I don’t know what the coach said, but I was told he’d been on the boy throughout the first half and tournament officials were now reading the coach the riot act.

The damage had been done.

I took the boy aside and told him the coach was a bully. “Call your game,” I said, “and ignore him. You’re doing a great job.” He wasn’t the first young ref I’d seen in tears because an adult failed to act his age.

Much to his credit, he gathered his courage and finished the game. Feeling good about comforting and advising him, I turned to prepare my team for its own game.

It was the tournament semifinal, and a win meant we would qualify for the final and a possible trip to regionals. Our referee was tall and said little. I guessed he was in his early 20s and should’ve known better than to call the game from the halfway line, even if he was working along on a small field.

“This is for a final and these teams are busting their butts,” I yelled. “Work as hard as they are.”

I was hot.

The ref missed a call, then another. All, I thought, because he wasn’t hustling, wasn’t getting in position to see what was happening.

I was right, of course, but — as I learned later — I was also wrong.

Just as the heat of the day affected him, the heat of the moment got to me. I peppered and peppered him with comments until he told me to be quiet. He spoke calmly and didn’t show me a yellow card.

Certainly, I’d earned one. He demonstrated more restraint than I had.

My team lost what turned out to be a close, exciting game, and after the ritual handshakes, I signed the scorecard and unloaded a final volley of criticism.

It was only later that I learned what a fool I’d been.

“Do you believe that referee?” I asked my wife and daughter. “You’d expect more someone his age.”

The referee I thought was 21 or 22 was, my family said, actually 15 or 16. He just looked older.

I didn’t believe them, just as others couldn't believe Freddy Adu was actually 14 when his Major League Soccer cameo began. He, too, looked older.

There was no excuse. As a coach, I’d always preached that players should adjust to referees and play through their shortcomings. I wasn’t one to find a scapegoat.

As it turned out, I hadn’t taken my own sermons to heart.

The next day, I went up to the referee and apologized.

“I was out of line yesterday,” I said, shaking his hand. “I shouldn’t have said what I said.”

The tall boy stood quietly and listened.

As with my friend’s young son, my good judgment arrived after the damage had been done. It might’ve been true that our referee failed to hustle. But as an adult, I’d failed an even bigger test — not being mature enough to find a more appropriate way to vent my frustration.

David Knopf refereed high school and youth soccer, high school and college basketball and umpire college baseball. This originally appeared in the 8/06 issue of Referee.

NASO MEMBER-GET-A-MEMBER MEMBERSHIP DRIVE

As an active NASO member you should have received a special e-mail entitled "NASO 2009 Member-Get-a-Member."

Each year NASO counts on members like you to help grow membership by encouraging your officiating friends and colleagues to join NASO. Our goal with this Membership Drive is to sign on 1,000 new members this year.

Best of all as an NASO active member – when you help sign up a new member both you and your nominee* will save $10 in membership dues when you get a member to join.

There is no limit – nominate as many officials as you feel would benefit from being an NASO member. The more members you bring in – the more you save. For example, if you brought in five new members, you would receive a $50 membership dues credit. Bring in 10 new members and your next annual NASO membership is FREE.

As soon as your nominees join NASO, you will receive a $10 dues credit for each new member as long as you and your nominee(s) remain active members for the next five years.

Plus each of your new members will also receive a $10 membership dues credit for their new NASO membership.

Don’t miss out on this great opportunity to save on your membership dues and help your association grow!

Click here to access the membership invitation and forward this to a fellow official, crew members or association members you feel share the same commitment shared by more than 16,000 NASO members.

Conditions: NASO members will receive $10 off the regular annual NASO membership rate of $94.  Other special membership offers do not apply.

Membership dues credit will be applied on the member’s next membership renewal notice. 

At any time, if an NASO member or new member (nominee) does not renew membership to NASO the membership rate will revert back to the current annual NASO membership rate for each party.

This special offer is available April 2, 2009-December 31, 2009.

*Nominee cannot be a current NASO member.

**Rate applies to U.S. only.

LATEST FROM REFEREE BOOKS
NASO EDUCATION PARTNERS
Platinum, Gold and Silver Partners
Amateur Softball Assn of America
ArbiterSports
Arizona Interscholastic Assn
Bank of America
Big Ten Conference
Cliff Keen Athletic
Colorado High School Activities Assn
Fox 40 International
Georgia High School Assn
Honig's Whistle Stop
Iowa High School Athletic Assn
Kentucky High School Athletic Assn
MLB
NBA
NBRF
NFHS
NFL - Partner Grant
NFLRA
NHL
Ohio High School Athletic Assn
Referee Enterprises
RefNation
Sun Belt Conference
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Assn
United Football League
USA Football
Published by the National Association of Sports Officials, (C) Copyright 2009. All rights reserved. NASO LockerRoom is published monthly for members and friends of NASO. Our goal is to keep you informed of association activities, services and benefits as well as improve your individual officiating skills.