| Much
of the content of the 2003 Conference focused on off-field accountability
of officials, how what officials do in their time out of uniform
can have an impact on the pursuit of their avocation. But what
about when an official blows a late call during a game? In what
ways should officials be held accountable for onfield or oncourt
mistakes? How does that accountability affect officials
performance?
Larry Boucher noted
that experience is a big factor in onfield accountability.
"Newer officials tend to want to over-officiate," Boucher
said. "From a practical standpoint, at the entry level, we
have to deal with that while still nurturing them. Were
also more tolerant during the regular season than the postseason.
Patience must be meted out; the (newer) officials dont
know the rules as well as they should."
Should officials
face some sort of penalty for mistakes in judgment or rule
interpretation? Does the importance of the game become a factor?
Esse Baharmast
said that if there are doubts about the competence of a certain
official, the USSF is likely to take assignments away from
the official or move the official down a level or two in an
attempt to determine where the problem lies.
The vast majority
of officials expect to be held accountable, even welcome accountability.
This session showed that officiating accountability doesnt
end when the game starts, rather, thats where it begins.
|